October 6, 2009

Annoying Facebook Users

From my own Facebook experience, I’ve noticed there seems to be a small but recurring cast of characters that serve only to annoy everyone else with their status updates.
Some of these may have come up on other lists on other sites, but that’s just coincidence and these are based on my own observations of my own facebook wall.

1. The “Latest update report on my new baby / puppy / kitten” person.
We get it, you’re proud of the new addition to your family and you’re keen to show it off, but do we REALLY need to know that this little bundle of joy / bag of fur “enjoyed his breakfast this morning!”? And do we really need three thousand new yet almost identical pictures of the tiny, bloated pink thing? No one is as interested in your baby or pet as you are. When we’ve seen it once we’ve seen it a thousand times.

2. The “mysterious” one.
You know the type – always fishing for you to ask them what their status means. Usually something along the lines of “Mel doesn’t know what to do…” or “Well! That didn’t end up as expected!”, just trying to tempt you into asking “Oh, what about?” or “What’s happened?” so they can bore you and everyone else with the details, yet make it look as if YOU asked THEM to talk.

3. The faux cry for help.
I’m sure everyone’s got one of these on their list. Every update is a variation on “Jen just wants to end it all” or “What’s the point in anything?”. Often combines well with number two to be both an irritating cry for help and a line to reel in the well wishers.

4. The girl who plays every single game and takes every single quiz.
So much so that her only status updates are her new high scores, who her ideal partner would be, which movie it is she’s most like, how compatible she is with Darth Vader and how fast she can name the capitals of the world. You wonder how this person gets on in life given that they seemingly spend 90% of the day taking quizzes on facebook. In the late 90s this is the person who would have sent on those god-aweful email chain letters asking you about your love life (or lack thereof) and warning you that if you don’t send it on to 10 people the consequences would be dire. DIRE!

5. The habitual drunkard.
Often, but not always, a college / university student, their only updates are to tell the world that either last night was a great night because they’ve never been that drunk, or that last night was so great they can’t remember what happened. And this happens every night.

6. The constant campaigner.
This is the person who only posts to invite you to join groups campaigning against some-or-other perceived injustice or cruelty somewhere around the world. Well meaning but naive, this person genuinely believes that a facebook petition is going to prevent drought in Eritrea or drug running in Laos.

7. The one who spells or punctuates appallingly.
I know this will rile some with cries of ‘Grammar Nazi!’, but there’s one on every list (or several, if you hang around with a pack of complete drongoes) who has no idea how to spell or use punctuation. Sentences like “…fink’s u realy need 2 gt out wiv more peep’s” show the both common misconception (amongst truly stupid people) that you need an apostrophe every time a word ends in ’s’, and a total inability to spell basic words like a functioning member of society. People who write like this and aren’t below the age of 9 should be shot.

komakino @ 10:13 am

May 21, 2009

Politics and age

When I was younger I was absolutely sure about my political views. I always knew which party to vote for and I knew absolutely my opinions – which policies I was in favour of, which I wasn’t. It was all very black and white.

Now I seem to be less sure. We have European and local council elections next month and I still don’t know which way to vote. I’m certain of only two things:

1. I will not vote Labour. I realise local elections shouldn’t be about national issues, but I can’t vote for a party that has so badly let the country down over the past decade. The 10p income tax rate abolition, the encroachment of the nanny state on personal liberty, the proposed introduction of unnecessary ID cards (and all the lying and hyperbole surrounded the reasons we ‘need’ them), the Regulation of Investigatory Powers act (appropriately RIP) and the recent situation where they shamefully tried to deny Gurkhas the right to settle in Britain. I could go on. No, Labour will not get my vote as long as Jacqui Smith remains Home Secretary to that dour Scotsman we inherited (and never asked for) at number 10.

2. I will not vote BNP. I could not bring myself to vote for such an openly hateful group of bigots. They can have their say and I’m pleased that they can get airtime on TV and aren’t censored. I like that they can spread their hateful message. Not because I like them or what they have to say (I hate them AND what they have to say) but because I firmly believe in free speech. They have the right to espouse their opinions and we have the right to call them racist biggots, laugh at them and ensure they remain a fringe organisation supported by people of low intellectual calibre and low moral fibre.

So that rant out of the way I’m torn between the Conservatives who want less control from Brussels, no ID cards and more policemen on the beat, the Lib Dems who want to save local schools and have a sensible, liberal approach to drugs, and the Green Party who also have sensible policies and think we should take care of the planet.

The problem is they all have policies I support and each no more so than the other.

Then there are the issues I’m not sure about:

Proportional representation. The Lib Dems have called for it for years. On the one hand I can see it enfranchises more of the public as our MPs are more representative of the general population. It gives smaller parties a greater say in government. On the other hand it gives fringe parties more of a say and can lead to idiots like the BNP gaining seats in parliament. It can also lead to situations like Italy and Israel where there are so many smaller parties that no party wins elections outright and no party has a mandate to govern, leading to coalition governments that can’t agree on anything and, in Italy’s case, a new general election virtually every year because the previous government has broken down. Back on the other hand again, at least this stops governments churning out useless legislation because they have a large majority in the commons.

Or the House of Lords. On the one hand it’s an anachronistic, unelected institution full of partly deaf, rich, upper class pensioners that stinks of advantage. On the other hand they’ve admirably kept the Government in check recently over issues like detention without trial (Jacqui Smith’s fault, again).

So you see my problem.

I thought with age we became more stubborn, but in my case it seems I get less and less sure about the things I thought I knew.

komakino @ 11:58 pm

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »
x